| DATE OF BUG REPORT | BUG EXPLANATION | QUERY TYPE | STATUS | FIXED AT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 10, 2024 | Testing 2 pdb structures, very similar in size, metals and their number, yet: 6qnq - works 6qnr - server error 500 | bug | Fixed | May 13, 2024 |
| March 10, 2024 | 6bjr does not show | bug | Not fixed | None |
| Feb. 15, 2024 | 5j4d 500 error | bug | Fixed | May 14, 2024 |
| Jan. 23, 2024 | 6xwz does not center well | bug | Not fixed | None |
| Jan. 12, 2024 | get Server Error (500) no matter what I submit. | bug | Fixed | Jan. 23, 2024 |
| Jan. 7, 2024 | I upload my PDB file but I get a served 500 error right after submitting my job. What should I do? | bug | Fixed | Jan. 23, 2024 |
| Nov. 3, 2023 | 7XK6 should show Ca ion, prolem with NH, changing xyz coordinates of ions helps but why? | bug | Not fixed | None |
| Nov. 3, 2023 | Add validations of halogens: 8AD0 | bug | Not fixed | None |
| Aug. 24, 2023 | It seems like almost all metals in all pdb files now give very poor scores, 6 or lower, even ones that performed much better a week ago. Dear User, Thank you for providing your feedback. In comparing metal ions, an approximate ranking can be established by considering the metal in the position of the current one. This comparison involves three parameters that may vary: Atomic contacts Valence Geometry Each of these parameters contributes a maximum of 2 points, resulting in a total potential score of 6 in the current version. In previous versions, the remaining parameters were remaining constant. E.g. Parameters such as B-factor (env) are not taken into consideration due to the requirement of approximately 3 cycles of refinement for each metal ion to attain accurate results. Such process would demand a significant amount of time. We can implement choosing scooring approach (old/new) in upcoming ~2 weeks. Best regards, Minor Lab | bug | Partially fixed | Aug. 26, 2023 |
| May 24, 2023 | cmm soes not draw distances to sulfurs | bug | Fixed | Aug. 24, 2023 |